How to punish Western media that denigrate and demonize Russia.
На русском языке читать тут: Космо Правда
The attacks of the Western media on Russia are already sickening, and many Russians are even shaking with impotence in front of them. Yes, Russians don't know English properly and they don't have the opportunity to Express their indignation in the media space of the West, but something must be done about it.
You can not just sit and flow around after another tub of dirt. This article is intended for translation into other languages, so it will not look very presentable.
Article in Der Spiegel "The Kremlin and the attack on Putin's troublesome opponents. Navalny's conspiracy" will serve as an example of how the magazine's editorial staff misleads its readers.
The publication deliberately cuts out of context what may make the reader think about what happened to A. Navalny.
Without waiting for a special investigation and analysis of the hospital Charité, Der Spiegel has almost decided for everyone who is guilty of the serious condition of the "oppositionist".
Judge for yourself, the headline of the article Kremlin, poison and attack on Putin's opponents, already says that it was Vladimir Putin who initiated the poisoning of the blogger with poison.
But has anything already been proven? Of course not. And if so, this article has nothing to do with high-order journalism, although the magazine itself positions itself as a significant information and political publication in Germany and Europe.
The article mentions some secret actions of doctors at the hospital Charité, which, according to the publication Der Spiegel, turned to the Bundeswehr, namely the laboratory in Munich, where the best specialists in Germany on poisons and combat chemicals work.
Also, with reference to the Bellingcat research platform, the article refers to a request to the British research center in Porton Down, infamous for the mysterious deaths of its employees and the alleged poisoning of Sergei Skripal and his daughter by Novichok.
Let me remind you about the Dutch office Bellingcat. Its founder, Eliot Higgins, initially drew information from computer games, as he admitted. Once Der Spiegel already apologized for their fake ELA analysis, but apparently this case was not enough for them.
According to the authors, Charité experts are simultaneously dealing with the case of a Bulgarian arms dealer poisoned by a substance that the GRU is allegedly responsible for.
What are these Russians "stupid" that they must necessarily poison everyone with a terrible substance of mass destruction? Even in Georgia, Saakashvili's enemies somehow peacefully moved to another world, banally poisoned by carbon monoxide in the bath! Well, stupid, as soon as they appoint American presidents?
What are these secret appeals that the editorial staff of the magazine knows about and no one else? Apparently a serious office!
The "fighters of the information front" might as well have turned to the Martians and then the article would have been called Putin conspired with the Martians to eliminate his opponent.
What opponent, a blogger with 2% of the electorate? This, my friends, smacks of banal political slander.
Eight years ago, it became known that the German Federal intelligence service (BND) had controlled and manipulated the magazine's editorial staff for many years. It is unlikely that their tentacles released their prey today.
Apparently the following happened. Once the secret became clear, the editorial Board's funding was reduced. According to open information, since 2014, the circulation has decreased from 1.1 million copies to 700,000.
There are also objective reasons for this decline in reader interest associated with the development of digital technologies, but the digital version of the magazine has ceased to be attractive, which indicates an editorial crisis.
The change of four chief editors in recent years has not led to success and the magazine has gradually turned from a solid publication into a tabloid read.
The Der Spiegel journalist and award-winning journalist spent seven years making up stories until he was caught faking them and fired.
The editorial Board recognized this period of time as the "low point" of its history. The awards of the sofa investigative journalist were taken away, and the name of the thirty - three-year-old writer was Claas-Hendrik Relotius.
Add to everything else and a couple of scandals caused by two magazine covers. On one of them, Frau Merkel is surrounded by Nazis, on the other, D. trump with the head of the statue of Liberty in his hand.
Let's go back to the article and to the point I mentioned above, namely, about taking very important information out of context.
The magazine reports that during the last trip to Novosibirsk (I will note that A. Navalny was under his own recognizance not to leave), the blogger was asked: why is he still alive, since he is so persecuted?
Gentlemen, you won't believe it, but Der Spiegel didn't even deign to publish his answer, and do you know why? Yes, because it completely destroys their version. This is so low-grade!
Even the Washington Post didn't do it, and the German edition didn't hesitate:
At one of the rallies, Alexey was asked why he is still alive, given all his enemies?
Navalny replied jokingly that he should not look for an excuse that he had not yet been killed, and then added:
"Vladimir Putin does not want me to be made a Martyr, and if I am killed, it is unlikely to help him."
These words completely contradict the collapse of accusations against Russia, think about it. I do not rule out that the Russian secret services simply overslept the killer, if there was one, but the doctors managed to save Alexey.
I mean, Alexey's Western curators squeezed everything they could out of him, and the last act of his heroic existence could be a sacred death, which fits perfectly into the events of Khabarovsk and Minsk.
The editors of the magazine were smart enough to post advertising material on their page that directly indicates the price of their attitude to the blogger and to themselves.
For seven years, your colleague lied and twisted people's souls, and you pretend that you didn't know anything. Seven years! You still continue his work and who are you after that?
When it turns out that only Khodorkovsky could have received bonuses from Navalny's death, you won't even apologize, will you?
Question: can a person with a normal mind refer to this source of information as serious?
Author Oleg Potopyak
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий